Не могу установить необходимые зависимости для Skype для Fedora 23 x86_64

http://www.if-not-true-then-false.com/2012/install-skype-on-fedora-centos-red-hat-rhel-scientific-linux-sl

Спасибо за все ваши быстрые ответы, я решил установить fedora 24 и следовал приведенному выше руководству, чтобы установить Skype, и это сработало.

I need to move this from comments to an answer so it fits. We need to figure out what is dependent on those packages that are causing the conflict so that it can be fixed. Please paste the results into another pastebin site and add the link to your question.

I tried installing the packages as you did on my fedora 23 machine and had no issues / conflicts at all. I think what is going on here is that you have multiple versions of those conflicting packages installed because another package marked them as required at that version. We can try uninstalling just the older versions and see what they impact there are other ways to query for this, such as dnf repoquery --whatrequires --alldeps), but its a bit of a pain in the butt, and asking it to remove the package is quick.

It is harmless as long as you don't reflexively hit 'Y' when asked if you want to continue the removal and you don't add a '-y' flag to the dnf command.

First, run the following sequence of commands to clear out the metadata and any cached files, check for any errors in the rpm database, and update the dnf metadata. The dnf check command will take a while to run without any indication of progress.

sudo dnf clear all sudo dnf check sudo dnf makecache 

If running dnf check outputs any errors, stop here and update your question with that output.

The next one will show us what repos you have installed, and if they are enabled or not.

dnf repolist all 

Now we need to make sure the right ones are enabled. Go through that list that was just output, and make sure that at least the following 2 repos are listed as "enabled". I don't believe any of the packages you are installing are from other repos, but I didn't exhaustively check - but you aren't having a problem getting them. I did confirm that the updates you need are from one of these two:

fedora
updates

If either of those are not enabled, run one or both of the following commands:

sudo dnf config-manager --set-enabled fedora sudo dnf config-manager --set-enabled updates

Now run the following:

dnf update 

If there is an error, or nothing updates, please post that info.

The packages we are looking at with multiple versions, which is indicated by the version formatting like pkgname-epoch:version.fc23.arch. If multiple versions are not installed, the epoch is not output by dnf.

libpng-2:1.6.17-2.fc23.x86_64 openssl-libs-1:1.0.2d-2.fc23.x86_64 

Lets see if they are in fact duplicated:

dnf repoquery --duplicated 

Check the list that is output by that call against the list of problem packages, if there are any matches, try to uninstall the older version(s) of the duplicates. You will get a chance to review what will get uninstalled as a result of making this call, so if there are packages you aren't sure of or there are hundreds or thousands listed, click no. If it is a reasonably small number of packages, it will be fine to remove them - you can reinstall if needed. I would expect only the two packages above will get fixed by this:

dnf remove $(dnf repoquery --duplicated --latest-limit -1 -q) 

Either click yes to remove when prompted by dnf, or post the output and people can help you decide if it's ok to remove them.

The other problem packages that need to be updated are:

libgpg-error-1.20-1.fc23.x86_64 alsa-lib-1.0.29-2.fc23.x86_64 pcre-8.37-4.fc23.x86_64 elfutils-libelf-0.163-4.fc23.x86_64 krb5-libs-1.13.2-11.fc23.x86_64 glib2-2.46.1-2.fc23.x86_64 

For these we need to get info on them. It's possible that are duplicates and were addressed in the earlier step, but the Epoch wasn't indicated for whatever reason. They are all out of date and should be at higher revs, but for some reason you've stated that they are not being updated when calling dnf update.

on each package from the list run this command (I'll just provide an example for the first one):

dnf info all libgpg-error 

This next command might provide a huge list, if so, it probably can't be removed painlessly. If it is an empty list or just a couple items, you can try removing it.

dnf repoquery --whatrequires libgpg-error --alldeps 

Let me know how it goes. These package managers (dnf,yum, apt-get etc) primary job is to avoid these sorts of circular dependency train wrecks, and they are generally pretty good at it these days. Except apparently for you.

What I can tell you is that this issue is not present by default in a fedora 23 install - I had no issues installing those packages. So it was something that was installed at some point, at around the time that those packages were at that version. The --whatrequires information will show you what that program was, if it was a single program and you see it in common with all the problem packages. If you find it, try removing it.